Last week’s post was directed at helping you with an inexperienced, untrained interviewer. Unfortunately, you are likely to meet those folks far more often than the experienced, well-trained interviewer. The suggestions I provided last week are also useful when talking with a competent interviewer. And let’s face it, you probably will not know in advance the competency of your interviewer so prepare for the worst and hope for the best.
Speaking of well-trained, highly competent
interviewers, I can thank my colleague, Stan for this week’s topic. When reviewing my post with Stan last week,
he asked me what “knock-out” questions I used in my interviews. I was confident that I knew what he meant,
but just to be sure, I asked him for an explanation. A highly useful interview question, I did not
want to make any poor assumptions. Stan
told me that he used a few interview questions that if poorly answered would
eliminate the candidate from further consideration. He provided the following examples.
1. If
we hire you, what is your plan for the next 30, 60, and 90 days?
2. Why
should we hire you instead of the other highly qualified candidates in the
queue?
3. Why
do you want to work here?
4. What
motivates you more, the thrill of winning or the fear of losing?
As it turns out, Stan and I were on the same page
however, my methodology gets to the “knock-out” issue (suitability for the job)
in a different way, which may become another blog post. These questions are meant to learn how the
candidate will approach her work and how she might set priorities. They surface issues which the candidate
should have given serious consideration and preparation to discuss. The response gives the interviewer insight
into the candidate’s thought process. Additionally,
they help the hiring manager gauge the candidates’ interest level for the job
in question. Poor unfocused answers are
a big red flag. If the candidate has not
given any thought to these questions then she is likely not a good fit for the
job. “Knock-out” questions help the
interviewer validate the candidate’s Executive skills, (ability) motivation ( interest level) and fit
(cultural).
Executive Skills:
- Strategic thinking
- Goal Orientation
- Leadership ability
- Technical Proficiency
Motivation
- Self-awareness
- Personal drivers
- Career Goals
- Understands the job and expectations for success
- Is very interested in the job in question
Fit
- Understands and shares our values
- Belief in our product/service/mission
- Experience working in a similar culture
So, the “knock-out” question is meant to qualify/disqualify
the candidate on the most fundamental issues of concern to any hiring
manager. A satisfactory answer does not
mean that one will get the job. It is
the ante. The price of poker, so to
speak. They are meant as a starting
point to understand the three big questions on the mind of the hiring
manager; 1) can he do the job, 2) will
he do the job, and 3) will he fit our culture.
An executive recruiter begins with the same
fundamental questions. He may arrive as
his answers in a different way, but the result is the same. If you are not working through a third party
recruiter you should give serious consideration as to how you answer these
questions, as well. It would be useful
to talk with other experienced hiring managers to understand their knock out
questions.
To be successful in front of an experienced
interviewer requires preparation. Give
ample thought to the job you seek! Know
the kind of questions interviewers use to qualify candidates at the most
fundamental level. Preparation is the
key to success in any endeavor. Ace
your next interview by developing great answers to the obvious ‘knock-out”
questions.
Your feedback helps me continue to publish articles that you want to read. Your input is very important to me so please leave a comment.
Jim Weber, President
New Century Dynamics
Executive Search
www.newcenturydynamics.com
No comments:
Post a Comment